NSFW

WARNING

TODAY'S POST MAY BE CONSIDERED NSFW. THE PROCEEDING IMAGES WILL BECOME SAUCIER AND SAUCIER UNTIL THEY ARE SIGNIFICANTLY SALACIOUS. DO NOT VIEW THESE IMAGES IF BEING SFW IS OF A CONCERN TO YOU.DID I DELIBERATELY POST THESE ON A MONDAY SPECIFICALLY TO PUT YOU IN THIS SITUATION OF SPLIT SECOND DECISION MAKING? THAT IS ONE THEORY.

It only figures that eventually some more scandalous items would make their way through. Some of them general, some of them personal. I see the occasional sex toy. A glass dildo here, a fleshlight there. Not terribly noteworthy, unless I see them together, in which case I have promised to conjoin them to commemorate the occasion.
So, dipping our toe in to today's post of scandalous imagery, here is a picture frame featuring it's default placeholder image.

Kinda racy, and I'm not talking about the bike amirite?!

Let's take a closer look shall we? 

I mean, it's not exactly revealing but it's 9/10 of the way to an upskirt. That's one way to make your generic picture frame stand out from the rest. 

Here's a horrible shirt. Wait did I say horrible shirt? I might have meant handy chart.

What's odd about this is ever since I encountered this shirt with a chart of breast shapes and their names, I have seen similar charts posted in meme format around the internet featuring similar but different drawings, and generally all the same nick names. However, this shirt is the only one featuring "WATERMELORS".

So it turns out I meant horrible shirt all along. 

Here's a few examples of cards from a card deck featuring sexual acts.  A holdout from a time when most men would only masturbate while gambling.

And lastly came this incredible beaver shot. A picture of a young lady, revealing her lack of underwear. Held by a hand, photographed again, and THEN PRINTED AGAIN, and once more, held by my own hand and photographed.

 I am honestly surprised that I haven't encountered more intimate/candid shots such as this, but what's striking about this is that I received this second hand. Literally. It's almost as if somebody found this photo of his buddy's girl in a compromising position, but he knew he couldn't keep it for himself, so he took his own picture of the picture. Not only that, but this perving friend had a specific attachment to the photo in physical form. And then one day, it wound up in a donation bin to a clothes recycling company.

Here it is, scanned, presumably for better quality, although I think the size of my photo of the photo is physically larger. The photo itself seems so relatively timeless. An old looking couch, could be from the 60's onward. A pack of Marlboro cigarettes, a design practically unchanged since it's inception. The woman's clothing style, nonspecific. Her hair style, just a little long, not seemingly from any exact era. No DVD's or remote controls scattered around the couch area to help pinpoint the place in culture. This could be a person holding a photo he had found of his own mother from decades previous. There's almost nothing to go on other than that this photo was taken after the advent of color photography. And maybe the 60's.

It's hard to tell, but the subject may be holding up drug paraphernalia.

The utter lack of pixel quality was helpful in deciding to post this. The pelvic area is just kind of a non-specific blob of brown nothingness. It makes you wonder if the person who got rid of it did so because they realized the overall shittiness of the quality.

We're through.

I receive a lot of peoples photographs, many of them not terribly noteworthy. These stood out because they were framed, and disposed of together without any effort to spare the photographs from going god-knows-where to god-knows-who (turns out it was me and I have no problem sharing things that are donated for eventual public sale).

 A loving couple, throughout many stages. Smoochin', looking sweetly at eachother. A presumed age difference. A smug look, potentially due to concern over the angle of a selfie. These are intimate shots.
Their donation is telling. A relationship has to end for someone to get rid of these all at once, all in once piece. 

Which is why I wonder about this one...

...is this a beloved family pet? Well, if it was, and if the pet had passed on, you would think the owner would have made some effort to retain the pictures. Maybe in a little box somewhere.
It would be one thing if this was a beloved family pet who passed on and this picture frame was too much to look at every day. The sensible thing would be to take it down and store the pictures away somewhere until the heartache fades.
For this reason, I prefer to think that this dog did something unforgivable, and that the owners were simply so disgusted with it that they never wanted to see it's face again. Maybe it was secretly selling off it's dog treats to feed a nasty gambling habit. I dunno, anything. Some sort of betrayal would explain the need to ensure that it's every image would be cast off, never to be seen again.